There are many different types of learning opportunities that
we educators can provide for children in the early childhood centres relating
to technology and that can be both digital and non digital. Technology can be
defined as intervention by design through the use of practical and intellectual
resources to develop products and systems that expand human possibilities by addressing
needs and realising opportunities (Ministry of Education, 2007, p.32).
I personally wasn’t brought with all these new technologies
that are around for the children in this new generation. I think that children are
very lucky and in future they will be super talented with all these new technologies
they are promoted with. I would like to share this because I feel that it is
just wonderful how children use these new digital technologies which I personally
don’t feel comfortable in using. I went to babysit this 4 year old boy and I
was amazed to see him using an I pad and it was really astonishing to see that
he wasn’t playing games on it but he was on YouTube watching videos of how Lego’s
were invented. I was really impressed to
see that he didn’t get bored he was on it watching several videos for hours. It
is just great to see children so young using I pads, I pods and I phones. Te Whāriki states “New Zealand is part
of a world revolution in communication, technology, work and leisure. Change in
these and other spheres is a feature of everyday life” (Ministry of Education,
1996, p.18).
Through working in groups and getting feedbacks from my group
members on my reflections I have developed more knowledge from their positive
responses. Through group effort I also got an opportunity to share my views on
their personal reflections and offer them few ideas. I was suggested to read
few articles from my colleagues which I read and found it interesting how there
are several beneficial of technology and how it supports in children’s
learning. I was also recommended to read an article by Yang by one of my colleagues
which I found very supporting and it helps us educators to critically reflect
on our practices. “The process of reflection includes reflective thinking and
self examination during or after teaching” (Yang, 2006, p.11). As teachers when
we reflect on our practice it helps us to improve and make changes to our
teaching. O’Connor and Diggins (2002), suggests “as a reflective practitioner,
you commit to learn continuously about your teaching, by teaching and them
thinking about what you’ve done, what others did and what happened during the
process” (p.9). I discovered that we should let children explore for themselves
rather than directing them and I believe that we all are learners and as early
childhood educators we are learning alongside children every day in the
setting.
Technology plays an important role in children’s learning and
development and most of all children develop their creativity and imagination
skills. Through technology children also get to develop their independence and
confidence. By working with their peers they also gain social skills. When we
as educators ask them open ended question while they are taking part in some
activities this helps enhance their thinking and reasoning. Children also expand
on their problem solving skills. Technology is about helping people and solving
problems (Smorti, 1999). To conclude, through the use of various types of
technologies children extend significantly on their knowledge and skills.
References
Ministry of Education. (1996). Te
Whāriki, He whāriki matauranga mo nga mokopuna o Āotearoa: Early childhood
curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The
New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand: Learning Media.
O’Connor, A., & Diggins, C. (2002). On reflection: Reflective practice for early
childhood educators. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Open Mind Publishing.
Smorti, S. (1999, Autumn) Technology in
early childhood. Early Education, 19.
Yang, S-H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and
community of practice. Educational
technology & society, 12 (2), 11-21.
No comments:
Post a Comment